Fish and starfish in the Royal Society's Repository Anonymous
Product images of Fish and starfish in the Royal Society's Repository
Fish and starfish in the Royal Society's Repository
Studies of a 'Square Acarauna' (brought from Surinam, and known by mariners as 'The Old Wife'); a 'Mailed Fish of Brasile' (Brazil) - 'Cataphractus Schonveldii' in Grew's description; upper and lower views of a 'Smooth Star-Fish or Sea-Pad, Stella marina laevior ... sent from the East-Indies'; and a 'Crowned Star-Fish. Stella marina coronalis ... taken in the Danish-Sea'. Table 8 from the book Musaeum Regalis Societatis; or, A catalogue and description of the natural and artificial rarities belonging to the Royal Society, and preserved at Gresham Colledge, by Nehemiah Grew (second printing: London, 1686). The Royal Society's museum collection, or Repository, was established in the 1660s. It was intended to be "a General Collection of all the Effects of Arts, and the Common, or Monstrous Works of Nature", for use by the Fellows in their attempts to understand and classify the natural world.
Original: engraving. 1681
- Image reference: RS-10411
- The Royal Society
More by the artist Anonymous.
Explore the collections Animals and nature prints and drawings, Royal Society prints.
We use a 240gsm fine art paper and premium branded inks to create the perfect reproduction.
Our expertise and use of high-quality materials means that our print colours are independently verified to last between 100 and 200 years.
Read more about our fine art prints.
Manufactured in the UK
All products are printed in the UK, using the latest digital presses and a giclée printmaking process.
We only use premium branded inks, and colours are independently verified to last between 100 and 200 years.
Delivery and returns
We print everything to order so delivery times may vary but all unframed prints are despatched within 2-4 days via courier or recorded mail.
Delivery to the UK is £5 for an unframed print of any size.
We will happily replace your order if everything isn’t 100% perfect.